Mr A. and Mr B. are two 64 yo male patients, have a heath check at Medic
Center some days apart.
On the PA and lateral CXR a round shadow about 3-6 cm of diameter seen
on anterior mediastinum R side.
On thoracic US examination, 2 encapsulated, with septations mixed structrure
of solid and liquid contents on R lower anterior mediastinum of 3-5 cm diameter
look alike on both patients.
CT scan of both chests show almost the same findings as a mixed
components with solid and fluid, septated, encapsulated, contrast enhanced on R
lower anterior mediastinum.
Imaging diagnosis: Right Anteroinferior Mediastinal Tumor can
be thymic origin.
Both men go for surgery to remove the anterior mediastinum tumor.
But the resullts from pathology are different:
The pathology report of Mr A.: THYMOMA TYPE A WITH CYSTIC CHANGE.
The pathology report of Mr B.:Undifferentiated Adenocarcinoma, invading lung tissue, EGFR (+)
Outcome of the patients:
Mr A. after the surgery is still living and working till now.
Mr B. still alive some months after radiation and chemotherapy.
A coincidence : 2 cases of incidentaloma with different outcomes. From this lesson we can learn that:
1/ Imaging diagnosis is only the shadow of the truth.
2/ Pathology give us one part of the truth.
3/ Clinical findings, imaging and pathology can give us almost the
truth.
4/ But the truth itself is the
outcomes of the patients .